One of the attractions of the Bargain Book Table is that it sometimes entices me to read authors I’ve never got around to reading, but who I feel I should have read. Edna O’Brien is one of those authors. When I saw one of her later novels, The Little Red Chairs on the bargain table sometime last year I automatically picked it up, and after reading the blurb on the back, I was intrigued enough to decide it might be time to rectify my omission.
Having finally got around to reading it, I’ve been struggling to get to the bottom of what I felt about this book until I remembered a conversation I had with my older brother many, many years ago (as in the 1980s years ago). We had rented One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest on VHS from the local video store (ah remember VHS!). I’d seen the film before and read the book, but my brother hadn’t. At the end (oh god, that ending…) I remember asking my brother what he thought of it. After a pause he said that he thought it was a brilliant film, but… he really hated it. And that is more or less how I feel about The Little Red Chairs.
First a bit
about the plot. It starts when a mysterious stranger arrives in a small Irish
community seeking shelter. The man, who says he is from Montenegro, calls
himself a faith healer and after initial suspicion he is accepted by at least
most of the locals. Of course, there is discord because the point of putting a
mysterious stranger in the middle of a fairly insular community is to create
discord and provocation, otherwise there would be no story. The main discord
comes in the form of the relationship between our stranger and Fidelma McBride,
who is entranced by his exoticism and believes he can give her a longed-for
child she’s been unable to conceive within her marriage. From here tragedy and
trauma unfold that will ripple through the entire village.
I have to
say Edna O’Brien is a masterful writer and I was really involved with the first
part of the book as our stranger seduces both literally and metaphorically. But
there are undertones and whispers that he is not what he seems – a local hotel
worker who is a refugee from the Balkans is traumatized when he sees the
stranger having dinner in the hotel. There’s his constant fear of being photographed
and occasional violent impulses coming to the surface that whisper of greater
violence in the past as mentions of Srebrenica start to appear. It’s at this
point I began to get uneasy. I usually read in bed, but the echoes of the news
coverage on the horrors of the Balkan war began to poke at me and I found I
couldn’t settle when it came time to turn off the light and I started reading
the story during the day. I have to say it’s a testament to the power of the
writing and the skill of the author as a storyteller that she could make me
feel that way. (It’s funny that I can read someone like Stephen King with
impunity before bed, but this story made me not want to close my eyes.)
The echoes
of violence in the past are one thing, but when one piece of shocking and
sickening violence erupts in the here and now I nearly put the book down and it
was only the hope that there was restitution that made me continue with my daylight
reading.
Most of the
second half of the book deals with the results of that violence. Of what it is
like to be both a victim and an outcast and how you build a life when you live
in the twilight world where people refuse to acknowledge your existence and how
it is almost impossible to articulate what happened to you for fear of being
accused of being complicit in the creation of your own trauma. There’s really
good commentary in this section about the invisible nature of refugees who
almost seem to occupy a parallel space to the ‘real world’ where they see but
are not seen.
There is a
short third part to the book which I suppose is meant to bring at least some small
degree of resolution if not restitution and while there is one completely
joyous scene, I was left feeling pretty empty at the end. The book deals with
deception and self-deception, with the lies people tell themselves to justify
their action and the lengths that people will go to, to defend themselves from
the real or imagined threats of others. For me it was a book all about the
‘Other’ – the interloper, the refugee, the people who don’t look or think or
worship like you and what an individual or an entire population will do to keep
the ‘Other’ at bay.
These are
all huge topics and worthy of a writer’s time, so why am I comparing my
reaction to my brother’s when he watched One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest? There are plaudits galore both on the back
cover and the first few pages from most of the broadsheets and they are right
to praise the quality of Edna O’Brien’s achievement as a writer because The
Little Red Chairs is a superbly written book. A writer should also provoke and
here she gets another tick in the box.
But for all that, the bottom line is that I didn’t enjoy it. I’m not
against been made uncomfortable and being challenged by my reading material –
there is always an element of risk and reward when you start a new book, but in
this case the rewards didn’t outweigh the risks because the whisper and threat
of violence made me twitchy and the actual explosion of violence made me want
to put the book down. In the end I only finished this book out of a stubborn
need not to put it away half read, and at that point the author lost me.
To
paraphrase my brother many years ago – I thought The Little Red Chairs was a
brilliantly written book, but… I hated it
The
question now is, if I see another Edna O’Brien on the Bargain Book Table will I
take a chance or not? I’d like to think I would because just like you shouldn’t
judge a book by its cover, I shouldn’t judge an author with such a sterling
reputation on the strength of one book. I’ll cross that bridge when I come to
it, but in the meantime there are far too many other books on my shelves
waiting to be read.
The Little
Red Chairs by Edna O’Brien was first published in 2015 and my copy was
published by Faber and Faber.
Comments
Post a Comment