It’s true
to say that whether you enjoy a book or not, or even whether you finish it, can
often be as much about the mood you were in at the time as it is about the
literary, or otherwise, merits of the book in question. Rivers of London by Ben
Aaronovitch has been sitting on my bookshelves since 2014 when we had a brief sojourn
back to Blighty in an expensive experiment to prove that we’d rather be in
Canada after all.
Anyway,
back to the book in question. It had been recommended by practically everyone I
know back in the UK, and that was enough for me to seek it out, and at the time I think
it was also a way of connecting back with the UK after years away because Rivers of London is by
its nature a very British book. With that in mind and given that our attempt to
fit back into British life was not altogether a success, in retrospect it’s
perhaps no surprise that I didn’t get on with the book. I mean, I really didn’t
get on with it. I started it, but while it was a perfectly okay read as far as
I got, I couldn’t see what everyone was raving about because it was doing
nothing for me, so I just quietly slipped it back on the shelf with only a few
chapters read and decided I’d never take another book recommendation from any of
those friends again.
Fast
forward six years and I’m sitting on our deck, squinting at the thermometer
which reads 31 in the shade and wondering what to read next. I wasn’t in the
mood for the great modern novel (see my comments in the post on History of Wolves) and my overheated brain remembered Rivers of London. I decided to give
it another go since the circumstances were kind of different from when I bought
it in 2014 – back then I was always skirting the thin edge of a work-related
panic attack, where as now I’m retired and skirting the thin edge of decisions
about whether to nap or not to nap.
Anyway,
this is all a long-winded way of saying that over the last two afternoons I’ve
galloped through the best part of 400 pages that make up Rivers of London and I
enjoyed every single one of them immensely.
It’s the
story of Police Constable Peter Grant who has the disconcerting experience of meeting
a ghost in Covent Garden while guarding a crime scene. Before you can say ‘you’re
nicked’ Peter finds himself co-opted to The Folly, a part of the Metropolitan
Police that deals in all things supernatural and is headed by Detective Chief
Inspector Thomas Nightingale. Soon Peter is learning about magic, investigating
an escalating series of seemingly senseless murders and attacks and delving
back into London’s rich and sometimes murky history to look for clues.
If that wasn’t
enough, he also finds himself in the middle of a dispute between Mother Thames,
Father Thames and a troop of their sons and especially daughters who are
personifications of the many rivers of London. I bet if he’d known all that was
coming his way, Peter would have taken the nice dull admin job he was originally
destined for in the Case Progression Unit and run a mile from DCI Nightingale
and all things supernatural.
I’m very glad Peter didn’t do a runner, because for one, there would be
no book, and that would be a shame as I wouldn’t have had something lovely to
read for the last two afternoons.
Rivers of London is a delightful book. I suppose you’d call it a modern
fantasy crime novel, and one of the reasons I said at the start that it was a very
British book is that it is rooted in London, not just as a setting for the
story, but in the modern and arcane geography and history of the city.
Aaronovitch is steeped in the details of how London as a city grew – about how
rivers disappeared or went underground, about how the city changed to deal with external factors such as the Great Fire, or the Blitz or most destructive
of all – post-war urban planning. I’m pretty familiar with some of the areas of
London featured in the book and that definitely makes for a richer reading
experience, but it’s not really necessary to have that knowledge – Aaronvitch’s
light, entertaining style will pull you along just as happily if you are a
tourist, as it would if you were a resident. The writing is engaging, the
characters rich and fully drawn, the plot is as twisty as the Thames herself,
or possibly himself depending on where on the river you are and London is not just
a backdrop to the action, but is an essential part of the story.
All this to say that I thought Rivers of London was a super read and I’m
very glad that I didn’t get rid of it back in 2014 when my mood was vastly different
than it is now. It’s the first in a series of books about PC Peter Grant and
his adventures with the supernatural and the others will definitely be going on
my ‘to read’ list for the future.
Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovitch was first published in 2011 and my
copy was published by Gollancz.
This is a lovely thing to read - and a lesson to us all not to write off every book you bounce off the first time. You're right about mood and its impact, of course. I'm glad you returned to it and it suited you. How handy that there are now lots more!
ReplyDeleteIt really was a lovely thing to read and just what I needed as a pick-me-up. I have the next two books on my Wish List should the other half be stuck for something for a birthday present. :)
DeleteMood has such a big impact on what I want to read. I have had Joan Didion's 'The Year of Magical Thinking' on my shelf since 2006. I love her as a writer, but every time I look at that book I think, hmm, maybe next month. Now, 14 years later... See, now I've dared myself!